| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/09/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/09/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BORGHI, E.; CRUSCIOL, C. A. C.; NASCENTE, A. S.; SOUSA, V. V.; MARTINS, P. O.; MATEUS, G. P.; COSTA, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
EMERSON BORGHI, CNPASA; CARLOS ALEXANDRE COSTA CRUSCIOL, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; ADRIANO STEPHAN NASCENTE, CNPAF; V. V. SOUSA, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; PRISCILA OLIVEIRA MARTINS, UNESP, Botucatu-SP; GUSTAVO PAVAN MATEUS, APTA; CINIRO COSTA, UNESP, Botucatu-SP. |
|
Título: |
Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 51, p. 130-139, 2013. |
|
ISSN: |
1161-0301 |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.006 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sorghum is an excellent alternative to other grains in poor soil where corn does not develop very well,as well as in regions with warm and dry winters. Intercropping sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]with forage crops, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf] or guinea grass(Panicum maximum Jacq.), provides large amounts of biomass for use as straw in no-tillage systems or aspasture. However, it is important to determine the appropriate time at which these forage crops have tobe sown into sorghum systems to avoid reductions in both sorghum and forage production and to maxi-mize the revenue of the cropping system. This study, conducted for three growing seasons at Botucatu inthe State of São Paulo in Brazil, evaluated how nutrient concentration, yield components, sorghum grainyield, revenue, and forage crop dry matter production were affected by the timing of forage intercrop-ping. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. Intercropping systems werenot found to cause reductions in the nutrient concentration in sorghum plants. The number of pani-cles per unit area of sorghum alone (133,600), intercropped sorghum and palisade grass (133,300) andintercropped sorghum and guinea grass (134,300) corresponded to sorghum grain yields of 5439, 5436and 5566 kg ha−1, respectively. However, the number of panicles per unit area of intercropped sorghumand palisade grass (144,700) and intercropped sorghum and guinea grass (145,000) with topdressingof fertilizers for the sorghum resulted in the highest sorghum grain yields (6238 and 6127 kg ha−1forintercropping with palisade grass and guinea grass, respectively). Forage production (8112, 10,972 and13,193 Mg ha−1for the first, second and third cuts, respectively) was highest when sorghum and guineagrass were intercropped. The timing of intercropping is an important factor in sorghum grain yield andforage production. Palisade grass or guinea grass must be intercropped with sorghum with topdressingfertilization to achieve the highest sorghum grain yield, but this significantly reduces the forage produc-tion. Intercropping sorghum with guinea grass sown simultaneously yielded the highest revenue per ha(1074.4), which was 2.4 times greater than the revenue achieved by sowing sorghum only. MenosSorghum is an excellent alternative to other grains in poor soil where corn does not develop very well,as well as in regions with warm and dry winters. Intercropping sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]with forage crops, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf] or guinea grass(Panicum maximum Jacq.), provides large amounts of biomass for use as straw in no-tillage systems or aspasture. However, it is important to determine the appropriate time at which these forage crops have tobe sown into sorghum systems to avoid reductions in both sorghum and forage production and to maxi-mize the revenue of the cropping system. This study, conducted for three growing seasons at Botucatu inthe State of São Paulo in Brazil, evaluated how nutrient concentration, yield components, sorghum grainyield, revenue, and forage crop dry matter production were affected by the timing of forage intercrop-ping. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. Intercropping systems werenot found to cause reductions in the nutrient concentration in sorghum plants. The number of pani-cles per unit area of sorghum alone (133,600), intercropped sorghum and palisade grass (133,300) andintercropped sorghum and guinea grass (134,300) corresponded to sorghum grain yields of 5439, 5436and 5566 kg ha−1, respectively. However, the number of panicles per unit area of intercropped sorghumand palisade grass (144,700) and intercropped sorghum and guinea grass (145,0... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Brachiaria brizantha; Consorciação de cultura; Gramínea forrageira; Panicum maximum; Sorghum Bicolor; Sorgo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Cropping systems; Forage; Intercropping; Urochloa brizantha. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03322naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1966661
005 2013-09-19
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1161-0301
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.006$2DOI
100 1 $aBORGHI, E.
245 $aSorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time.
260 $c2013
520 $aSorghum is an excellent alternative to other grains in poor soil where corn does not develop very well,as well as in regions with warm and dry winters. Intercropping sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]with forage crops, such as palisade grass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich) Stapf] or guinea grass(Panicum maximum Jacq.), provides large amounts of biomass for use as straw in no-tillage systems or aspasture. However, it is important to determine the appropriate time at which these forage crops have tobe sown into sorghum systems to avoid reductions in both sorghum and forage production and to maxi-mize the revenue of the cropping system. This study, conducted for three growing seasons at Botucatu inthe State of São Paulo in Brazil, evaluated how nutrient concentration, yield components, sorghum grainyield, revenue, and forage crop dry matter production were affected by the timing of forage intercrop-ping. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. Intercropping systems werenot found to cause reductions in the nutrient concentration in sorghum plants. The number of pani-cles per unit area of sorghum alone (133,600), intercropped sorghum and palisade grass (133,300) andintercropped sorghum and guinea grass (134,300) corresponded to sorghum grain yields of 5439, 5436and 5566 kg ha−1, respectively. However, the number of panicles per unit area of intercropped sorghumand palisade grass (144,700) and intercropped sorghum and guinea grass (145,000) with topdressingof fertilizers for the sorghum resulted in the highest sorghum grain yields (6238 and 6127 kg ha−1forintercropping with palisade grass and guinea grass, respectively). Forage production (8112, 10,972 and13,193 Mg ha−1for the first, second and third cuts, respectively) was highest when sorghum and guineagrass were intercropped. The timing of intercropping is an important factor in sorghum grain yield andforage production. Palisade grass or guinea grass must be intercropped with sorghum with topdressingfertilization to achieve the highest sorghum grain yield, but this significantly reduces the forage produc-tion. Intercropping sorghum with guinea grass sown simultaneously yielded the highest revenue per ha(1074.4), which was 2.4 times greater than the revenue achieved by sowing sorghum only.
650 $aCropping systems
650 $aForage
650 $aIntercropping
650 $aUrochloa brizantha
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aBrachiaria brizantha
650 $aConsorciação de cultura
650 $aGramínea forrageira
650 $aPanicum maximum
650 $aSorghum Bicolor
650 $aSorgo
700 1 $aCRUSCIOL, C. A. C.
700 1 $aNASCENTE, A. S.
700 1 $aSOUSA, V. V.
700 1 $aMARTINS, P. O.
700 1 $aMATEUS, G. P.
700 1 $aCOSTA, C.
773 $tEuropean Journal of Agronomy$gv. 51, p. 130-139, 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/05/1996 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/09/2013 |
|
Autoria: |
CUNHA SOBRINHO, A. P. da; MAGALHÃES, A. F. de J.; NASCIMENTO, A. S. do; SANTOS FILHO, H. P.; SOUZA, L. D.; PASSOS, O. S.; SOARES FILHO, W. dos S.; COELHO, Y. da S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALMIR PINTO DA CUNHA SOBRINHO, CNPMF; ANTONIA FONSECA DE JESUS MAGALHÃES; ANTONIO SOUZA DO NASCIMENTO, CNPMF; HERMES PEIXOTO SANTOS FILHO, CNPMF; LAERCIO DUARTE SOUZA, CNPMF; ORLANDO SAMPAIO PASSOS, CNPMF; WALTER DOS SANTOS SOARES FILHO, CNPMF; YGOR DA SILVA COELHO. |
|
Título: |
Cultivo dos citros. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1996 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Cruz das Almas/BA: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, 1996. |
|
Páginas: |
43p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Circular Tecnica, 26). |
|
ISSN: |
01008064 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Memória. |
|
Conteúdo: |
O trabalho faz referências ao clima e solos mais apropriados para os citros; bem como a um conjunto de praticas recomendadas para a exploração comercial da cultura, contemplando a indicação de variedades copa, porta-enxertos, o controle de pragas e doenças, culturas intercalares, colheita e comercialização. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Acid lime; Acis time; Citros; Citros spp; Citrus spp; Citus spp; Coeficiente técnico; Coeficientes técnicos; Coficiente tecnico; Cultivation pratice; Cultivo; Cultura; Lemon; Lima acida; Lime; Mandarim; Mandarin; Orange; Porta enxertos; Porta-enxerto; Rootstock; Stock for grafting; Tangerine; Techinical coefficients; Technical coefficient; Technical coefficients; Trato Cultural; Tratos culturais. |
|
Thesagro: |
Fruta Cítrica; Laranja; Limão; Porta Enxerto; Tangerina. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Citrus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/88908/1/Cultivo-dos-Citros-Almir-sobrinho-Circular-tecnica-26-1996.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01974nam a2200649 a 4500
001 1637576
005 2013-09-02
008 1996 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
022 $a01008064
100 1 $aCUNHA SOBRINHO, A. P. da
245 $aCultivo dos citros.
260 $aCruz das Almas/BA: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura$c1996
300 $a43p.
490 $a(Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Circular Tecnica, 26).
500 $aMemória.
520 $aO trabalho faz referências ao clima e solos mais apropriados para os citros; bem como a um conjunto de praticas recomendadas para a exploração comercial da cultura, contemplando a indicação de variedades copa, porta-enxertos, o controle de pragas e doenças, culturas intercalares, colheita e comercialização.
650 $aCitrus
650 $aFruta Cítrica
650 $aLaranja
650 $aLimão
650 $aPorta Enxerto
650 $aTangerina
653 $aAcid lime
653 $aAcis time
653 $aCitros
653 $aCitros spp
653 $aCitrus spp
653 $aCitus spp
653 $aCoeficiente técnico
653 $aCoeficientes técnicos
653 $aCoficiente tecnico
653 $aCultivation pratice
653 $aCultivo
653 $aCultura
653 $aLemon
653 $aLima acida
653 $aLime
653 $aMandarim
653 $aMandarin
653 $aOrange
653 $aPorta enxertos
653 $aPorta-enxerto
653 $aRootstock
653 $aStock for grafting
653 $aTangerine
653 $aTechinical coefficients
653 $aTechnical coefficient
653 $aTechnical coefficients
653 $aTrato Cultural
653 $aTratos culturais
700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, A. F. de J.
700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, A. S. do
700 1 $aSANTOS FILHO, H. P.
700 1 $aSOUZA, L. D.
700 1 $aPASSOS, O. S.
700 1 $aSOARES FILHO, W. dos S.
700 1 $aCOELHO, Y. da S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
